One thing clear about the Christian worship servicet is that the Bible is not clear on how it “ought” to be performed. There are many different views but only the reformed and charismatic perspectives will be briefly portrayed and examined. On one hand the reformed ideal for a worship service is guided by order and supported by a ritual of activities rich in the history of the Church. On the other hand, the charismatic ideal for a worship service is an intense worship experience where there is an encounter with the Holy Spirit accompanied by signs and wonders and new and fresh experiences. Both ideals have strengths and weaknesses. However, if each camp merely pursues its’ own ideal then they are left with an immature and unbiblical expectation of how the worship service “ought” to be. Therefore, further explanation is needed in order to flush out the benefits from these different ideals in order to serve these purposes.
The reformed ideal for a worship service is guided by order because God is a God of order. Thus, the service is usually done with a type of ritual order that is made up by various parts. One part of the service is corporate prayers such as the Lord’s Prayer and/or the corporate confession of sin. It is also typical for creeds to be read such as the Apostle’s creed, which has been in the church for hundreds of years and sums up what a Christian ought to believe. There is also typically a great veneration and respect for the Lord’s Supper, and this sacrament is taken more often in a reformed tradition than in a charismatic one. This also includes someone sharing about what the Lord’s Supper symbolizes the benefits of grace it provides, and a warning to those who have unconfessed sin or are unbelievers not to partake of it lest they incur judgment upon themselves. One of the most important parts of the worship service is the preaching of the word because this is where God’s word is preached for the edification of the body of Christ, and is where God’s sovereign will is manifested to his people. Another part of the service is the singing of songs, but often there is a greater respect for historical hymns and songs such as the doxology than is given in a charismatic service. At the end of the service a benediction or prayer of blessing is pronounced upon the congregation.
It is important to note that the large idea that formulates the reformed perspective of a biblical service is God’s transcendence and thus his lofty and holy nature. In short God is above his people and the world and in light of this, there is not an expectation for God’s Spirit to show up and change the service. Indeed, this is why so much painstaking thought and effort is taken in order to plan the service in a manner that best edifies the body of Christ and glorifies God. The service is very intentional and is planned and ordered because it is thought of as the godly thing to do.
In addition, when faced with the question ,”what a biblical worship service is supposed to look like,” the reformed camp does not merely gather from biblical support but heavily values and looks to history as well. What did the early church services look like and what did the early church do? The Apostles Creed testifies to this reformed value. Besides it educating the Christian on what they ought to believe, the Apostles Creed is a rich and historical part of the Church. Thus, if the Church has spoken it for so many hundreds of years then the question is why not say it anymore?
On the other hand, the charismatic ideal of a worship service is an intense encounter with the Holy Spirit accompanied by signs and wonders. Though not typically as many as the reformed service, there are also different parts that make up the charismatic service. One of these parts is an openness and expectation for the manifestation of spiritual gifts. The charismatic camp longs to hear prophetic words every Sunday, to see healings, miracles, and even more extreme parts seek after signs such as gold dust. Another part is the preaching of the word, but the ideal in the charismatic preaching is to have a fresh word from the Lord, and what is preached is supposed to be what the Spirit of God is leading the pastor to preach. Singing is also an important part of the service and these songs are often newer songs that will be sung for a few years and then eventually become dull and then dismissed in light of newer and fresher songs. There is often great excitement, emotion, and affection shown in the singing of songs than in the reformed camp as these are highly valued in order to portray one’s love for God. The sacraments are also given though usually not as often as the reformed church and usually in a more individual and emotive manner. Yet, the best expectation for the service is for the Holy Spirit to fall in such power that there is no sermon given, no “ordered” service per se, but an encounter with the Holy Spirit in which He minister’s to his people.
It is important to note that what forms the charismatic perspective of the biblical worship service is the imminence of God, and thus his Spirit filling his people and being close to them. This is why the people often cry out for God to pour out his Spirit in greater and greater heaviness, with cries to God for “more and more and more” of his Spirit. This type of service is seen as seeking after God for an intimate experience with his presence.
In addition, when faced with the question, “what a biblical service is supposed to look like,” the charismatic camp does not tend to look at history but at the present Church at large and who is being more successful. For instance, there was a recent outpouring of God’s Spirit in Lakeland, FL and when charismatcis go to this type of service they then return home wanting the same type of experience at their church with an understanding that this “ought” to be a typical service.
One of the strengths of the reformed service is their intentional pursuit to form an ordered service, and thus careful attention is given to every detail for the edification of the church and the exaltation of God. Thus, the sermon is carefully prepared in order to adequately preach the Scriptures, and because of this the sermon is clear and professional. Whereas charismatics may try to preach off the cuff, which is often sloppy and more hype than edification. Another strength in the reformed camp is their value of Church history. Sadly, many Christians and charismatics in churches today look at the Apostles Creed or older hymns as boring and meaningless ritual. However, this only reveals such a person’s ignorance and utter disrespect for the richness of Church history to guide the present Church on how to best obtain a biblical service. If a reformed person knows the Apostles Creed then he can respond with what a Christian ought to believe, but if a charismatic person is asked what he ought to believe as a Christian then one will tend to get a plethora of different answers because they were never taught precisely what they ought to believe.
One strength of the charismatic service is the manifestation of spiritual gifts for the edification of the body of Christ. This is an important aspect of the service that must not be neglected, as much of the reformed camp does because of their false understanding that the New Testament gifts have ceased. Another strength is the hunger and eager expectation for the presence of God, to which God will often respond with the pouring out of his Spirit on his people unto their edification and his exaltation. However, too often this understanding that one must always be crying out for more of God’s Spirit often leads to a type of discontentment, which may be ungodly and not spiritual but fleshly. This is revealed by many charismatics who are unhappy with their church and may even leave it because the church they attend doesn’t measure up to the revival they just came from. Thus, in their pursuit of the presence of God they rightly hunger for God, but loose a godly contentment and understanding that the service is not primarily about their experience with God but about the edification of the body of Christ and exaltation of God.
In conclusion, the transcendence and imminence of God must be valued and kept in perspective. The history of the church is not boring but rich, and what is new, fresh, and seemingly successful may not actually be what is needed for a biblical service that edifies the body and exalts God. Intentional order must always be pursued but a healthy and eager pursuit of the Spirit of God and his gifts must be sought after. In such a reformed charismatic balance is a more biblical service then if left to themselves.
Such a timely post.
I’m reminded how Martin Luther did a tremendous thing in freeing the scriptures from the Roman church. There was a down side, however. When individuals interpret the meaning of scripture without following good principles they can end up way out in left field. Our culture elevates “self” over everything, and the unprincipled practices many charismatics embrace are usually self-focused.
An unbalanced charismatic believer approaches the worship service without context, seeking to “experience” God. The focus is on the experience and its effect on the person, rather than on the One experienced. I make this observation because many people leave a church when they conclude that “God is not moving there”. In fact, they are saying that they cannot feel/see/sense God’s moving, and, in effect, stand in judgment of the pastor, leaders, other members, etc. The only person not responsible for God’s seeming lack of activity is themselves.
There’s not much to say about the unbalanced Reformed believer. He’s frozen in place. “I believe what the pastor says, we pay him well to say it, and he has the Th.D. to prove he knows what he’s talking about. He tells me I’m saved. Have a nice day.”
I grew up hearing, on alternating Sundays, either the Nicene or Apostles creed, and I would testify that they were meaningful as I grew in the Lord. You say that these “sum up what a Christian ought to believe.” I would suggest a rewording. The creeds summarize historic Christian doctrine, issues that were settled by the church as God, in His Providence, worked through councils. Thus, the creeds sum up the basic doctrines of the Christian faith, and must be believed if we are to have a right theology.
The balance issue is crucial in these days. Both sides need to move.
I agree Steve, and you touched on something I wanted to touch on concerning charismatics but decided not to for brevity’s sake. Sadly, there is a this perverted idea that the most spiritual thing that can occur is for one to powerfully experience the presence of God. As you said, this can lead to an individual eagerly pursuing the presence of God and if he is not in a place where the “Spirit is moving” then they think they ought to leave. However, what is their grave mistake is that they are not thinking as a spiritual man but as an immature fleshly man. For what is spiritual is love, what is spiritual is the eidification of the the church and the furthering of God’s kingdom. Thus, the purpose the service is for the edification of the body of Christ to be built up into the likeness of Christ and not mere experiences. If experiences bring edification then praise be to God, but only edifying experiences are worthwhile, as Paul says in 1 Corinthians to the church to be zealous for manifestations that edify. The greater purpose of a curch is to further the kingdom of God and to edify one antoher. That should ver our VISION, not merely having experience after experience that makes some think that means they are more spiritual. Again, the spiritual man has the vision for edification and furhtering the kingdom of God.
I appreciate the emphasis on balance in this blog. As a “reformed bapticostal”, something that I always appreciate about a church is whether they do, indeed, display this balance. Too often, the choice becomes one of a church that emphasizes the Word or one that emphasizes the Spirit. Biblically, both are important, and every church should be actively and intentionally seeking both in every service.
I would add that the description of the charismatic churches is probably a bit limited. By its very nature, the charismatic movement reflects freedom, spontaneity, and diversity of gifts and experience. However, most of the charismatic (I’ll include Pentecostal and Foursquare here) services that I have witnessed, do include clear, systematic teaching of the Word. It would be the exception when a sermon has not been prepared well in advance, and it would be the exception when it would be discarded in terms of what the Spirit seems to be doing on any given Sunday morning. It certainly does happen, but in my personal experience, it has not been the norm.
I have less experience with reformed services, but the description given seems to fit my experience, so I can’t comment beyond what has been said. I would, however, love to hear from someone who has attended some reformed churches where the gifts of the Holy Spirit are routinely exercised and people are encouraged and built up not only through the Word, but through God speaking and moving through prophecy, intepretation of tongues, word of knowledge, word of wisdom, miracles, and healing, etc.
It seems to me, that any reformed church that seeks the freedom of the Holy Spirit moving in power, or any charismatic church that preaches the Word with care and diligence will display the kind of balance that I think we all are (or should be) seeking.
Gramps:
Andrew, the author of this post, is a graduate of RTS and the son of Bill Hyer, Senior Pastor of an Evangelical Presbyterian church. I also attend the same church (Christ Church EPC). We are open to the full work of the Holy Spirit and are reformed in our perspective.
-Steve
Steve:
That is excellent that you are open to the full moving of the Holy Spirit. Do you see the kinds of gifts, miracles, signs, etc. that I mentioned? If so, I would love to hear about how God is moving in your church? (This is not to say that God isn’t moving in other ways, but the article is about that balance of charismatic & reformed experience.) If not, do you expect to see them in the future?